The Creation of a Database of Individuals Convicted of Electronic Fraud: A Necessary Measure to Combat Digital Crime

UMA MEDIDA NECESSÁRIA PARA O COMBATE À CRIMINALIDADE DIGITAL

Authors

  • JOÃO CARLOS ERMELINDO BERNARDO FDSBC

Keywords:

Digital fraud; online scam; electronic fraud theft; Law No. 14.155/2021; Budapest Convention; criminal database.

Abstract

This article analyzes the migration of crime into the digital environment, focusing on the exponential growth of electronic fraud in recent decades. It examines the legal developments in Brazil, particularly Law No. 14.155/2021, which criminalized electronic fraud and online scam offenses, as well as the international measures arising from the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime. The study demonstrates that digital fraud has distinctive features, characterized by sophisticated modus operandi and the offenders’ tendency to recidivism, often encouraged by the perception of impunity. It also highlights the vulnerability of victims and the investigative challenges posed by such crimes. Drawing on foreign experiences, the paper argues for the creation of a national database of individuals convicted of digital fraud as an essential tool for preventing and repressing these offenses, strengthening investigative work, reducing recidivism, and countering the perception of impunity.

References

ANDEREZ, Dario Ortega; KANJO, Eiman; ANWAR, Amna; JOHNSON, Shane D.; LUCY, David. The Rise of Technology in Crime Prevention: Opportunities, Challenges and Practitioners' Perspectives. Preprint, 26 jan. 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.04204. Acesso em: 01 out. 2025.

BAGUETE. Crimes digitais crescem 800% em cinco anos. Disponível em: https://www.baguete.com.br/noticias/crimes-digitais-crescem-800-em-cinco-anos?utm. Acesso em: 1 out. 2025.

BITENCOURT, Cezar Roberto. Furto mediante uso de dispositivo eletrônico ou informático. Consultor Jurídico, 14 jun. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.conjur.com.br/2021-jun-14/bitencourt-furto-mediante-uso-dispositivo-eletronico-ou-informatico/. Acesso em: 30 set. 2025.

BRASIL. Código Penal. Decreto-Lei nº 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del2848.htm. Acesso em: 29 set. 2025.

BRASIL. Decreto nº 11.491, de 12 de abril de 2023. Promulga a Convenção sobre o Crime Cibernético, firmada em Budapeste em 23 de novembro de 2001. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2023/Decreto/D11491.htm. Acesso em: 30 set. 2025.

CASINO, Fran; PINA, Claudia; LÓPEZ-AGUILAR, Pablo; BATISTA, Edgar; SOLANAS, Agustí; PATSAKIS, Constantinos. SoK: Cross-border Criminal Investigations and Digital Evidence. arXiv, 25 maio 2022. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.12911?utm. Acesso em: 1 out. 2025.

CIFAS. Fraudscape 2025: record fraud levels – Cifas. Londres: Cifas, 2025. Disponível em: https://www.cifas.org.uk/newsroom/fraudscape-2025-record-fraud-levels?utm. Acesso em: 1 out. 2025.

CIFAS. National Fraud Database – Cifas. Londres: Cifas. Disponível em: https://www.cifas.org.uk/fraud-prevention-community/combined-threat-protect/national-fraud-database?utm. Acesso em: 1 out. 2025.

CONTIERI, Nichollas Flávio. O fundamento da diferença entre furto mediante fraude e estelionato. Escola da Magistratura do Paraná – EMAP, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.emap.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/NICHOLLAS-FLAVIO-CONTIERI.pdf. Acesso em: 29 set. 2025.

CORREIA, Sara Giro. Responding to victimisation in a digital world: a case study of fraud and computer misuse reported in Wales. Crime Science, v. 8, art. 4, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-019-0099-7. Acesso em: 1 out. 2025.

COSTA, Adriano Sousa; GUIMARÃES, Gustavo Ribeiro Costa Rigo; TORRES, Thiago. Questões práticas sobre o estelionato após as Leis 13.964/2019 e 14.155/2021. Consultor Jurídico (ConJur), São Paulo, 28 set. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.conjur.com.br/2021-set-28/academia-policia-questoes-praticas-estelionato-leis-139642019-141552021. Acesso em: 1 out. 2025.

EZE, Thomas Chukwuma; OKONKWO, Patrick; AMADI, Chinedu. Cybercrime Modus Operandi: Computer Misuses. American Journal of Research in Computer Science, v. 7, n. 1, 2025. Disponível em: https://sdiopr.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/2025/JANUARY/14_Jan_2025/2024_AJRCOS_128138/Rev_AJRCOS_128138_Eze_A.pdf?utm. Acesso em: 01 out. 2025.

GEKOSKI, Anna; ADLER, Joanna R.; McSWEENEY, Tim. Profiling the Fraudster: Findings from a Rapid Evidence Assessment. Policing and Society, v. 33, n. 6, p. 739-757, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17440572.2022.2137670?utm. Acesso em: 2 out. 2025.

HAVERS, Benjamin; TRIPATHI, Kartikeya; BURTON, Alexandra; McMANUS, Sally; COOPER, Claudia. Cybercrime victimisation among older adults: A probability sample survey in England and Wales. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2023. Disponível em: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11654966/?utm. Acesso em: 01 out. 2025.

MISRA, Gaurav; JUNGER, Marianne; MONTOYA, Lorena. A Cross-National Study on Cybercrime: Incident, Suspect and Victim Characteristics for Digital and Traditional Fraud in the Netherlands and Kolkata, India. Journal of Forensic Sciences & Criminal Investigation, v. 10, n. 5, 2018. Disponível em: https://juniperpublishers.com/jfsci/JFSCI.MS.ID.555634.php?utm. Acesso em: 01 out. 2025.

MONSTERSGAME. “Which countries are most affected by online fraud? Study reveals.” Monstersgame, 27 mar. 2025. Disponível em: https://www.monstersgame.co.uk/technology/which-countries-are-most-affected-by-online-fraud-study-reveals/. Acesso em: 29 set. 2025.

MIRABETE, Julio Fabbrini; FABBRINI, Renato N. Manual de direito penal: parte especial arts. 121 a 234-B do CP. 37. ed. Indaiatuba: Editora Foco, 2024.

NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE (Reino Unido). Using data analytics to tackle fraud and error. Londres, 2025. Disponível em: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/using-data-analytics-to-tackle-fraud-and-error.pdf?utm_. Acesso em: 1 out. 2025.

SERASA EXPERIAN. “Brasil tem recorde nas tentativas de fraude registradas em janeiro, aponta Serasa Experian.” Serasa Experian, 17 abr. 2025. Disponível em: https://www.serasaexperian.com.br/sala-de-imprensa/indicadores/brasil-tem-recorde-nas-tentativas-de-fraude-registradas-em-janeiro-aponta-serasa-experian/. Acesso em: 29 set. 2025.

SHANG, Yuxi; WU, Zhongxian; DU, Xiaoyu; JIANG, Yanbin; MA, Beibei; CHI, Meihong. The psychology of the internet fraud victimization of older adults: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 set. 2022. Disponível em: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9484557/?utm. Acesso em: 01 out. 2025.

SINDICATO DOS EMPREGADOS EM ESTABELECIMENTOS BANCÁRIOS – TUBARÃO. “Fraudes em canais eletrônicos crescem 17% e golpes via Pix aumentam 43% em um ano.” 11 mar. 2025. Disponível em: https://www.bancariostb.com.br/noticia/fraudes-em-canais-eletronicos-crescem-17-e-golpes-via-pix-aumentam-43-em-um-ano/. Acesso em: 29 set. 2025.

THE GUARDIAN. “‘Remote purchase’ fraud in UK surges as customers tricked into disclosing passcodes.” The Guardian, 28 mai. 2025. Disponível em: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/may/28/remote-purchase-fraud-uk-surges-customers-tricked-passcodes. Acesso em: 29 set. 2025.

TIMES OF INDIA. “India’s cyber fraud epidemic: Rs 22,845 crore lost in 2024; 206% jump from previous year, says government.” Times of India, 22 jul. 2025. Disponível em: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/cybersecurity/indias-cyber-fraud-epidemic-rs-22845-crore-lost-in-just-a-year-206-jump-from-previous-year-says-government/articleshow/122840099.cms. Acesso em: 29 set. 2025.

TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO. Acórdão nº 19.016.309. Disponível em: https://esaj.tjsp.jus.br/cjsg/getArquivo.do?cdAcordao=19016309&cdForo=0. Acesso em: 01 out. 2025.

TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO. Acórdão nº 19.421.308. Disponível em: https://esaj.tjsp.jus.br/cjsg/getArquivo.do?cdAcordao=19421308&cdForo=0. Acesso em: 1 out. 2025.

TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO. Acórdão nº 19.639.856. Disponível em: https://esaj.tjsp.jus.br/cjsg/getArquivo.do?cdAcordao=19639856&cdForo=0. Acesso em: 01 out. 2025.

UNITED STATES. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) – About. Disponível em: https://www.ic3.gov/Home/About?utm&utm. Acesso em: 1 out. 2025.

UNITED STATES. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Internet Crime Report 2020. Washington, D.C.: FBI, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.ic3.gov/AnnualReport/Reports/2020_ic3report.pdf?utm. Acesso em: 1 out. 2025.

UNITED STATES. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Internet Crime Report 2023. [S.l.]: FBI, 2023. Disponível em: https://pt.scribd.com/document/835838296/FBI-Internet-Crime-Report-2023-1710798294-1?utm. Acesso em: 1 out. 2025.

ZHANG, Chuo Jun; GILL, Asif Q.; LIU, Bo; ANWAR, Memoona J. AI-based identity fraud detection: a systematic review. 2025. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09239?utm. Acesso em: 1 out. 2025.

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

BERNARDO, J. C. E. (2025). The Creation of a Database of Individuals Convicted of Electronic Fraud: A Necessary Measure to Combat Digital Crime: UMA MEDIDA NECESSÁRIA PARA O COMBATE À CRIMINALIDADE DIGITAL. Faculdade De Direito De São Bernardo Do Campo Review, 31(2), 18. Retrieved from https://revistas.direitosbc.br/fdsbc/article/view/1273